The image data contained in the RAW...
The image data contained in the RAW file belongs to the photographer not the manufacturer of the device that created the RAW file. As all books or articles on photography state, the camera is just a tool used to create the photographer's image. The RAW file is simply a negative just like film. Like film, I should be free to process that negative my way and with my tools. I also want to be able to access my RAW file without worrying that my camera manufacturer no longer supports my RAW format. From a development standpoint, the cost to both the manufacturer of the camera and the software companies to support multiple RAW formats just does not make sense. Especially, when the format changes between different models from the same manufacturer. Besides, lets have a more reasonable division of labor. The camera manufacturer are great at making the hardware and software companies are better at making the software to process the RAW files.
I agree with Michael Reichmann, I do not care what format is used as long as it is universally supported.
I agree with all you are saying. But, think one thing...
I agree with all you are saying.
But, think one thing through. Why would a Powershot have the same software as a 1DsMkII; or, a Coolpix have the same as a D2X? They don't need it and the cost would be passed into the low end model. People that use them aren't looking for that quality or power.
Conversely, what if the high stuff was bound by the point-and-shoot? If a Chevy had everything the same as a Cadillac, why buy the latter?
Seth